All this is just preamble to say, I have made another on a similar topic (see below), but using only my dictaphone and Audacity (open source software which I actually preferred using to Audition). So I apologise for the slightly dodgy quality.

This is about what magazines people are loving at the moment, and whether they would prefer to use the internet to read them, or the physical copy.

One of the final covers of Maxim magazine, which will become an internet only title. Image from www.maxim.co.uk

But much broadcast content is aimed at women and although the women’s monthly market isn’t in great shape, ABC figures show it is doing better than the men’s lifestyle mags. Brown suggests that this is because women’s publishing has a wider range that appeals to most ages and demographics.

Read the rest of the article here.

I’m not sure myself, but would be interested to know what you think: has a bombardment of other media made you less interested in men’s monthly magazines? Or were you never that interested in the first place?
And what’s the difference between men and women when it comes to magazines?

If you haven’t been watching this, you should. It’s on BBC4 at 10.30 on Wednesday nights. Here’s a (rather long) taster. 10 minutes, yes, but worth it. Keep watching to the end and there are some great The Day Todayesque visual metaphors about the credit crunch from Five News.

And talking of The Day Today, how great was that? Every time I watch Channel 4 news and their love affair with graphics, it makes me think of it. News has truly eaten itself.

Here’s Chris Morris (love him) starting a war:

Most people unsurprisingly search for “magazines”. Any post with “magazine” in the title gets more hits. Curious, I entered “magazines” into google. I trawled through 15 pages of search results before I got bored and gave up. So, people who trawl through how ever many hundred and then click on this: I salute you. And apologise if the content is not at all what you were looking for. If anyone could tell me how many pages it is, I would be interested to know.

Other less common search terms include the people who spend their time looking for information on Peaches Geldof and Disappear Here, and those who specifically search for “peaches geldof journalism”. The latter is surely oxymoronic.

Due to a post I wrote about mistrusting journalists, I get traffic from people who search for “journalists lie”, or those more specific terms: “journalists who have lie to get around” and “journalists who have told lies to keep j” (I assume job).

Recently, searches for “unemployed journalists” have led to me. Depressingly prophetic perhaps.

Occasionally people search for my name, Katie Jacobs. As I have a namesake who is an executive producer on House, I fear it is not me they are searching for.

But my all time favourite search term has got to be “how to tidy a stationery cupboard”. Honestly. This would have led to my post on the joys of work experience, but why would someone search for that? Was some poor intern somewhere in the world asked to do the lowliest of jobs and, rather than just get on with it, was so keen to make a good impression that they looked for instructions? I really hope so. In case they come back, I go for: paper and envelopes organised by size and near the top, heavier objects nearer the bottom.

Over to you guys now – anyone else had someone reach their blog/website through some truly bizarre search terms?

Edit: I’ve also had this one: “christopher hall -”estate agents” +brits”. Somehow, I doubt they were looking for tell! editor, Chris Hall.

Update: Yesterday (7.04.09) I got: Porn magazines, lovely

The Times won the top prize and was named Newspaper of the Year for it’s “all round excellence.” I’m not normally a Times reader myself (it comes from being brought up in a house where you’re force-fed the Guardian and the Indy from a very young age, I think), but on the occasions I do buy it, I find it a good read.

The Guardian won best website for the second year. I love the Guardian website. I spend too much time there. Especially when on work experience, ahem. It’s streets ahead of other British newspaper sites, in my opinion.

Guardian writer Charlie Brooker was named columnist of the year. I do like a bit of Brooker (Screenburn and Wipe especially) and was a bit star-struck when I met him in a pub last year. However I think he’s been going off a bit lately. His vitrol doesn’t feel as real as before somehow. Of the nominees, I think I would have preferred to see Johann Hari from the Independent win.

The Mail‘s women’s magazine You won supplement of the year. I don’t (won’t) buy the Mail but when I see You in waiting rooms and the like, I always pick it up. In fact, my mum’s taken to stealing it from the communal area of my Grandma’s sheltered housing, depriving the elderly. It’s usually got great content, but I wouldn’t put it on a par with Observer Woman.

Gillian Tett from the FT was named journalist of the year for her coverage of the world’s economic “meltdown”.

The Guardian liveblogged the event and has a full list of winners here

tell! magazine cover - if you think that's bright, wait until you see the real thing

After two weeks of eating, breathing and sleeping (or rather not sleeping) tell! magazine, we sent the final PDFs off to the printers on Friday. Today Chris (our illustrious editor) and I (not so illustrious production editor) visited the printers in darkest Middlesex, along with Nat and Nick from X-City magazine, to sign off the proofs. It all looks great so far and it seems as if the last two weeks of intense work have really paid off. The hard copy will be available for free in selected places in London from April 7th – I’ll let you know exactly where nearer the time.

For me, the past two weeks have been the best of the course and I’m feeling bereft without production fortnight to think about. It’s made me remember that I love the production side of print media as much as the writing, the whole package is what I went into journalism for. And as cheesy as it may sound, the team spirit in the ‘office’ was amazing.

Publishers of independent magazine Little White Lies told us last term that they launched during the last recession as they couldn’t find jobs. If this lot of graduates are in the same position this time around, maybe we’ll have to think about starting our own publication.

Watch this space for news on the launch of our hard copy edition of tell! In the meantime: www.tellmag.co.uk

Check out www.tellmag.co.uk, the website of the great mag one half of magazine journalism group at City University are currently putting together. Tell! combines real life stories with entertainment, lifestyle and humour in an easy to read and fun package.

Tell! magazine - new real life magazine

I’m production editor which means I spend my days grappling with InDesign to make our pages look the best they can and writing endless lists and schedules to make myself feel better about the about of work we have to do.

The first hard edition of Tell! will be available for free in a few weeks’ time. We’ll be distributing it around various bars, cafes and shops in London. I’ll be sure to keep you posted. In the meantime, please visit the website.

Featuring (in order) Jesse Whittock, Jenny Ruby, Chris Hall, Iain Withers (off newspaper, not mag), Stephen Eddie and Lauren Vandekar.

Death of the magazine: Goodbye to all this?

Very depressing, but I disagree (well I’d have to, otherwise why would I be doing the course). Magazines have a brigher future ahead of them than newspapers, not that that’s hard. A beautifully designed magazine is a treat, and more of an aesthetic pleasure than a newspaper. People may want their news on the internet in bite-sized form, but magazines can go into subjects far more in in-depth, long features. Magazines must of course interact with multimedia, but they should also produce great content, such as longer features, that cannot be replicated that easily on the web. And as Mike Soutar of Shortlist says, new business models must be explored.

Of course, I am biased towards magazines, but I hope they have a long future ahead of them. I’ll certainly keep buying them in obscene quantities. Mainly so I can get a job.